We have noticed a change in the debt collection industry. First, the debt collectors – junk debt buyers – seem to be more aggressive. Second, there is more competition to make profit. New collection agencies are popping up attempting to tap into the “golden egg” of consumer debt. Third, the junk debt seems to be sold over more than twice. It is taking longer than 30-60 days to totally eliminate the alleged debt. The larger the amount the longer it may take.

One thing that is CONSISTENT about collection agencies and debt collectors. THEY ARE UNPREDICTABLE. We teach you how to take steps to debt elimination quickly.

With Collect Corp Inc, we noticed their headquarters is in Canada. However, this company has offices located in New York (soon to close?) and Arizona. Apparently, consumers take THEM to court, and the consumer is the plaintiff.

Collect Corp Inc has been in business for a long time and the competition may be hurting their profit. Therefore, this agency could be threatening consumers to pay up.

If you have been contacted by Collect Corp Inc, contact our office for a free analysis.

NEXT LEVEL CREDIT

“Taking Your Credit to the Next Level”

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

2 Comments

Brachfeld & Associates is a father – daughter business. They own a (Collect America) CACV CACH franchise also which is tied into Arrow Financial collection agency. Please note: B & A face many lawsuits for allowing their employees to pose as attorneys, District Attorney’s, Attorney’s General and other law enforcement. This collection “attorney” attempts to do business in California and Texas. Their office has a “rent a lawyer” who does not know how to litigate, however, they file lawsuits with bogus documents. 

Erica Brachfeld is not licensed as an attorney in Texas. Do not assume that any attorney is licensed with the bar in that state. Do your research. Everyone should be aware that Brachfeld is a junk debt collector/buyer with no knowledge of your accounts except what she reads off a computer screen after purchasing charged off debts. If you are being contacted by this company, call our office or sign in for an analysis.
 
Here is a recent excerpt from an EMPLOYEE at Brachfeld & Associates and Bud Hibbs comment following:
 
I was reading an article you had posted about Brachfeld and Associates and found it rather interesting. I am a former employee of Brachfeld and Associates and thought I would respond. I am not a bitter ex employee but more concerned for the rights of the consumers they are calling. One statement you made in the article I stumbled upon was that the collectors were “crammed” into a small office with a white board to put up the daily totals. That statement is 100% true. They recently opened a new office located in Dublin Ohio and the sad part is that Brachfeld Associates are not even licensed to collect in the state of Ohio. Another interesting fact is we were taught to state the following on any contact made: We have been retained to collect the balance in full within 30 days of the account being placed or we will forward your account to an attorney in your jurisdiction to file suit. This was stated even if we had no intention on filing a lawsuit, half the time we would call the account even 60 days after making that statement. We were also trained to state on answering machines we need to hear from either you or your attorney. Both statements being a clear violation of FDCPA. Last but not least I spoke up to the newly hired VP of operations about how these were clearly violations of the FDCPA and how it was not right and I was told to pack my things and I quote “Get the f**k out of my office NOW” with several witnesses there. Hopefully this will be useful in your future endeavors….
 
We have information that appears to validate that Marty Brachfeld (the convicted thief & disgraced former lawyer) continues to practice law there, in violation of California law. Their Texas lawyer, a smart young many named Tariq Franklin Gladney, 29 years old, of Houston, licensed to practice law less than a year ago, is about to learn that whoring a law license has repercussions that could affect him and his career for a very long time. We all know Erica Lynn Brachfeld-Shubin is a puppet of her father and not considered bright enough to have an original thought. Marty Brachfeld is a criminal who does not belong in this business. He is a liar, a thief and a con man, out to rip off anyone he can, if it means money in his pocket. That entire operation is a den of criminals who are a half step from a jail cell. The Ohio State Bar is being made aware of Brachfeld and their criminal enterprise as is the AG of Texas. Tariq Gladney has never handled a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act suit that I could find. He is going to realize that renting a law license in exchange for a percentage of the money stolen from consumers has severe consequences. Marty belongs in prison, that may happen as his actions are now being monitored closely. Anyone with insider information on Brachfeld is asked to contact us, we will not divulge the source. Consumers are warned NOT to send them money as you may not legally owe it, Marty has little or no documents to validate it. Gladney is still too green to litigate an FDCPA claim Erica is still trying to figure out even less complicated issues. Contact us if you are dealing with Brachfeld/Meridian, it may end up being less expensive for you to retain a consumer law professional because Marty, Tariq and Erica have proved they are just not that smart. Beat these thieves at their own game, help put Marty Brachfeld in prison where he belongs. The Brachfeld organization is the type of garbage that needs to be cleaned up and face our criminal justice system. Marty is a serial criminal who is abusing the system, he should be barred from ever being involved with anyone licensed to practice law. Erica Lynn is his meal ticket, both are on a collision course much like the Lenahans of Buffalo, NY, he lost his license, hers was suspended for two years, for much the same as these two. Gladney will most certainly curse the day he ever cashed a Brachfeld check as his pristine reputation will nose dive into the sewer of Marty Brachfeld’s criminal reputation.TARIQ FRANKLIN GLADNEY… Why would such a bright young man who graduated from Texas Southern University, attended Thurgood Marshall University the University of Dallas, excel at so many sports and work so hard throw it all away over a jerk like Marty Brachfeld? Tariq, you will have to look into that mirror, tell your family, loved ones and those who helped you achieve those degrees and success that the Brachfeld money was worth the jump into the Marty’s sewer of slime. Is a 66 year old disbarred lawyer, who stole from his client is involved what many believe to be a criminal conspiracy that includes unauthorized practice of law, filing bogus court documents, possible mail fraud and other illegal activities worth what you busted your butt to achieve? You are either very naive, need to make a lot of money in a hurry or perhaps not as smart as what your hard work and background depict you.. TARIQ…WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING???
 

 

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Tags:

No Comments

North Carolina targets debt collectors

Oct 09 · by Next Level Credit

Another state is busy!

North Carolina recently enacted a piece of legislation that could prove to be a game changer for accounts receivable management companies in the state, especially debt buyers.

by ACA International
August 24, 2009

The North Carolina Legislature has enacted Senate Bill 974, which is effective October 1, 2009. SB 974 is currently on the governor’s desk for her signature. The bill significantly impacts collection of debt by debt buyers. The following is an overview of the bill, and it is important asset buyers as well as traditional third-party debt collectors understand how SB 974 may impact collection efforts in North Carolina.

Debt Buyer is a Collection Agency

The bill incorporates a debt buyer under the definition of a collection agency and specifically defines a debt buyer as a person or entity engaged in the business of purchasing delinquent or charged-off consumer loans or consumer credit accounts, or other delinquent consumer debt for collection purposes, whether it collects the debt itself or hires a third party for collection or an attorney-at-law for litigation in order to collect such debt. SB 974 dictates both active and passive asset buyers are considered a collection agency.

Prohibition on Suing and Arbitrating Time-Barred Debt

SB 974 deems it an unfair practice for a debt buyer or collection agency on behalf of a debt buyer to bring suit, initiate arbitration, or otherwise attempt to collect a debt when the debt buyer or agency knows or reasonably should know such collection is barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

ACA International understands this requirement only prohibits debt buyers and debt collectors collecting on behalf of debt buyers from filing suit or initiating arbitration in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt. Collection efforts such as sending letters and placing telephone calls to consumers are not prohibited as applicable statutes of limitation do not bar such collection activity.

In addition, this provision does not apply to traditional third-party debt collectors collecting debt for the original creditor.

Restrictions on Collection of Debt

The bill provides it is an unfair practice for a debt buyer or an entity acting on behalf of a debt buyer to bring suit, initiate arbitration, or otherwise attempt to collect a debt from a consumer without (1) valid documentation the debt buyer is the owner of the specific debt instrument or account at issue and (2) reasonable verification of the amount of the debt allegedly owed by the consumer. Reasonable verification includes: (a) documentation of the name of the original creditor; (b) the name and address of the consumer as appearing in the original creditor’s records; (c) the original consumer account number; (d) a copy of the contract or other document evidencing the consumer debt; and (e) an itemized accounting of the amount claimed to be owed, including all fees and charges.

Although North Carolina currently requires a collection agency to provide a consumer a receipt of payment if the payment received from the consumer is in cash, SB 974 requires a receipt be provided when any payment is received by or on behalf of a debt buyer. In addition to what must be included in a receipt under § 58-70-70(a), the receipt for payment received by or on behalf of a debt buyer must also include the name of the creditor(s) for whom collected, the account number assigned by the creditor(s), and the account number assigned by the original creditor if different from the current creditor for whom the debt is collected. The receipt must also clearly state whether the payment is accepted as either payment in full, as a full and final compromise of the debt, or state the balance due after payment is credited if the payment is not in full.

These provisions apply to debt buyers and all collection agencies attempting to collect debt on behalf of debt buyers in North Carolina. It does not apply to third-party collectors collecting debt for the original creditor.

Requirements to File Suit

In order for a debt buyer to file suit or initiate arbitration against a consumer, the debt buyer must give the consumer written notice of its intent to file suit thirty (30) days prior to the filing, and the notice must include certain information such as an itemized accounting of amounts claimed to be owed and proof of ownership of the debt.

Moreover, SB 974 requires debt buyers provide their license number and a copy of the contract or other writing evidencing the original debt in the debt buyer’s complaint against a consumer, including information evidencing the original debt and chain of title. If the claim is based on credit card debt and no written signed agreement is available, the debt buyer must provide evidence the credit card was used. The bill also requires debt buyers provide information when seeking entry of a default judgment against a consumer such as an itemization of charges and fees claimed to be owed, the original charge-off balance, an itemization of post charge-off additions, and date of last payment.

If a debt buyer is seeking default or summary judgment against the consumer, the debt buyer must provide evidence to the court establishing the amount and nature of the debt, including providing the following items: (1) original account number; (2) original creditor; (3) amount of the original debt; (4) itemization of charges and fees; (5) original charge-off balance of explanation of how the balance was calculated if not charged-off; (6) itemization of post charge-off additions; (7) date of last payment; and (8 ) amount of interest claimed and basis for the interest charged.

Further, the bill states attorney’s fees will not be awarded absent a signed writing and an unbroken chain of assignment.

Increased Liability for Collection Agencies

The bill also increases civil penalties for all collection agencies in violation of the state’s collection agency provisions to not less than $500 and not more than $4,000 per violation. The remedies are cumulative.

This provision applies to debt buyers and all debt collectors attempting to collect debt in North Carolina.

NEXT LEVEL CREDIT
“Taking Your Credit to the Next Level”

 

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

No Comments

Nationwide Credit Inc in our backyard

Oct 02 · by Next Level Credit

Nationwide Credit Inc is established in Kennesaw, Georgia. This collection agency (junk debt buyer) has been in business for many years but we have not had interaction with them until recently. They also have an office in Arizona. They can be very persistent. Usually they do not have the proper documents to validate the consumer request.

We did some research and found this tidbit:

One of Country’s Largest Debt Collectors Agrees to Pay Record $1 Million Civil Penalty to Settle Charges of Violating Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

We find that Nationwide Credit Inc attempts to collect on American Express accounts (Amex). They often send letters with the Amex blue logo on it requesting the consumer to contact NCI with the 800# listed in the “settlement letter”. Don’t be fooled!

Contact our office if you are being contacted by NCI.

NEXT LEVEL CREDIT

“Taking Your Credit to the Next Level”

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

2 Comments