(SOL) Statute of Limitations Letter
Filed Under: Collections
Filed Under: Collections
Many consumers receive collection debt letters in the mail regarding accounts that have already been paid (no kidding) and/or the time limit to collect has expired. Junk debt buyers have names and account numbers of consumers who have paid a collection account even as far back as 10 years ago and they try to collect AGAIN. The trick for the debt collector is that the consumer most likely does not remember or has no documents of this account so they take the debt collectors word for it. This happens often. Debt collectors and collection agencies have no conscience.
A common scenario is that a debt collector will send you a letter to you if your name is similiar to someone else who HAS a collection debt and it may be a very old account that has expired under the guidelines of the SOL. The consumer questions it and the collector “convinces” them to pay. This is not even the consumers account but the collection agencies attempt to make it an “account” when it actually has another consumer name on it. Does this make sense?
THE MOST COMMON scenario is when the debt collector will send a letter that is 5-10 years old to collect. This falls under the statute depending on which state. The debt collector KNOWS that this is too old to collect on but they send it anyway because the consumer does not know their rights. The debt collector knows they legally don’t have any rights to collect but if the consumer does not know about the SOL then the consumer will start to pay the account. Instant profit for the debt collector.
If a certain amount of time passes and the consumer has not been able to pay the collection account, there is a time limit and the collection debt will expire under the SOL. The debt collector CANNOT collect on it. Please note that the SOL does not apply to all debts. The consumer has to check their state’s civil debt collection codes. You must not ignore the collection letters that are old. You can be sued. YOU MUST WRITE AN SOL LETTER.
We are adamant about not talking to debt collectors. They will trick you into making a payment or verbal agreement and that puts the account “live” and the collector lives for the dead to come alive with the SOL accounts.
It is imperative to document all action for your records.








Do not sign any letter you send to CA.
alsdkj, why do you say not to sign letter to CA?
To address both comments:
A consumer does not need to sign their “john hancock”. The typed name is sufficient.
You do not need to send SOL letters. These people know that these debts are past SOL and they will not sue because they will lose on the simple defense that the debts are past SOL. Any correspondence can potentially hurt you. Ignore and put all expense and time on their end. If they keep calling after having been informed then report them and tell them they are being reported.
Alex,
Thanks for your comment. Yes the CA knows it is SOL, however, NO it is not wise to ignore SOL alleged accounts. The CAs will still sue and SOL is NOT a strong defense in the court. Yes the CA will take you to court. Happens all the time.
We do not agree that “any correspondence can potentially hurt you”.
CAs do not care about SOL. Some of them specialize in SOL accounts.
The CAs DO NOT FOLLOW RULES!
A consumer cannot ignore the CA. That is an ostrich mentality.
~Next Level Credit~
Help, I have an account that was paid off on 2007, as a settlement, with Citi bank. MCM is now sending a statement saying that I owe then money + interest. I sent them all documentation saying the account was already paid off. They are telling me that the account numbers are different so therefore they say is it not the account that was settled. Can i send a SOL letter?
Layla,
Thanks for your comment. Who did you pay for the settlement? CIti? Or a collection agency?
This is a common occurrence.
DO NOT send them any info. It is up to MCM to prove it.
Yes you can send an SOL letter. We would not send an SOL letter.
You can go to our home page and sign in for a free analysis if you would like advice.
~Next Level Credit~
Help,
I received a collection letter from MCM collection agency about a mobile bill, that i never owned. I checked the reviews of this agency and they were really bad. Hence i sent a debt validation letter (certified). Now after a month, i got another letter which contains the header as SETTLEMENT OPPORTUNITY, where they are giving me 40% discount on the debt.
Please advise?. This is so frustrating.
thanks
venkat
Venkat,
Thanks for your comment. Sounds like ID theft. However you still need to get rid of that.
Depending on what you stated in your letter, MCM ignored it. We deal with them a lot.
We do not pay nor do we settle. We eliminate. We can help.
Sign in for an analysis today and we can talk Mon-Fri 9-5 EST. See our homepage for the form.
~Next Level Credit~
Is there a list of statue of limitations by state? I have a letter fromm Capital Mgmt Services for a credit card dating back to 2002 for Washington state.
Sharon
Thanks for your comment. Yes you can find a list online.
If you need advice, go to our home page and sign in to talk briefly about CMS between Mon-Fri 9-5 EST.
Beware WASHINGTON state has very bad collection attys and you may want to talk to us to learn more.
~Next Level Credit~
MCM is taking me to court. They sent me a letter of pre-legal notificaiton, but it was sent to an address that I have not lived at for 3 years. 2 months ago, I got a notice of court for a home depot card. I sent them a VOD letter, but they ignored it and sent me a disclosure statement showing: 1 plantiff’s affidavit, 2. acct field data sheet (it has my wrong b-day, phone # wrong and address wrong) 3.credit card statement dated 8/05, 4. bill of sale, midland pre-legal notification dated 9/28/11 sent to an address I have not lived at for 3 years 6. Midland to MCM affidavit. AM I TOAST. My only document to bring to court is a VOD letter they never answered.